My View by Jim Yacavone
(July 2, 2016)
There’s
a big debate at the county over how to divvy up the SPLOST funds if the SPLOST
referendum passes on the November ballot. There are many competing interests within
the county making a case to get a share of the money. I was going to work in an
analogy to pigs trying to feed at a small trough but I don’t want to offend any
of the involved parties.
SPLOST
stands for Special Purpose Local Option Sales Tax. It allows county voters to
vote to tax themselves an additional one percent sales tax to pay for county
“capital outlay projects” such as roads,
streets, bridges, police cars, fire trucks, ambulances, garbage trucks, and
other major equipment “for the use or benefit of the citizens of the entire
county.” The ballot referendum must specify how the additional revenue will be
spent, and this requires the county commission to pass an ordinance or
resolution providing the details.
Fannin Voters last approved a SPLOST in November 2010 to
start in October 2011. It expires September 2017. The new SPLOST, if approved,
will start in October 2017 and, presumably, run for six years, the same as the
last SPLOST.
The
commissioners haven’t made up their minds how the new SPLOST money will be spent.
This means they decided the county needed the additional revenue before they decided
what it was needed for. It’s clear the commission is counting on the SPLOST
being approved in order to pay for needed capital outlay projects. When government
starts counting on an additional tax there’s nothing special about it. It’s
just another tax.
That
being said, the one good argument in support of funding government needs
through SPLOST rather than an increase in the property tax is that because it’s
a sales tax it also falls on visitors to Fannin County. That relieves Fannin
residents of part of the tax burden. Hey, anytime we can get someone else to help
pay for our projects is okay by me.
Whatever
the merits of Fannin’s SPLOST and the projects it will pay for, voters should closely
scrutinize all taxing and spending decisions by government. Government has an
insatiable appetite when it comes to money and is always eager to spend our
money on something. And when you give government money, it’s sure to spend every
last dime.
But
that’s not the point of this column. The point is to argue that some portion of
the SPLOST revenue—a small portion I might add—should be used to help build a
new and larger library. Fannin residents do not have the library they deserve. The
current library in the courthouse is about 6,000 square feet. State standards
for new libraries say that Fannin County’s approximately 25,000 residents
should have a 15,000 square foot library. That does not even address future
population growth.
So
far the library has been given short shrift by the commission. This is terribly
short sighted on their part. The library is used by all segments of our
community. It is important to the education of our youth. Studies show that
public libraries are engines of economic growth and contribute to local
development through early education, employment services and small-business
development. Other studies show that libraries have a measurable positive
impact on the local economy and contribute to the stability, safety and quality
of life of their communities.
Regardless
of whether the commissioners use the library themselves (I am skeptical), they
should remember that our library has over 6,900 active library cards, and
that’s a lot of votes.
That’s my view. What’s yours?
No comments:
Post a Comment